Gabriel Hernandez itibaren East York, PA, USA

gabriel_hernandez

11/21/2024

Kitap için kullanıcı verileri, yorumlar ve öneriler

Gabriel Hernandez Kitabın yeniden yazılması (10)

2018-12-26 00:41

Centilmen Piç Serisi 1: Locke Lamora’nın Yalanları - Scott Lynch TrendKitaplar Kütüphanesi

Tarafından yazılmış kitap Tarafından: İthaki Yayınları

Drop City? More like Drop - alright I won't go there. Needless to say I was not pleased with this read. T.C. Boyle has apparently won prestigious literary awards. This is the only book I have read by him and it leaves me wondering how this is possible. Drop City is the story of a 20-something girl, nicknamed Star (ugh...), who joins a hippie commune in the early '70s in California that eventually chooses to pick up and move to their leader's uncle's cabin and land in Alaska. The book is simultaneously the story of the newlywed Sess Harder and his experiences both with his lifelong enemy and with the arrival of the hippies near his lot as the cold winter sets in in Alaska. Here's my three style gripes: One: He overuses the conjunction "and" so much both in narration and dialog that it becomes distracting. Two: He presents characters' thoughts right within the narration so it is sort of first person sometimes even though these first person thoughts that only one character has are presented in the third person voice. Three: The entire story often has two important events happen at the same time. Throughout, he presents one and then tells the reader about the other through character discussions in the fallout. In other words, he never abandons linear chronology; that is, until the climax, when the style abruptly changes. We see what happens from Joe's point of view, then we rewind and see it in Marco's point of view. Then Boyle returns right back to linear chronology for the remainder of the book. This is weak writing. Most importantly, Boyle is clearly mocking the hippie-way throughout the book, but the characters themselves do not learn or suffer too much at all. He does not present any real thought through the action of the plot. Instead, he peppers in sarcasm and cynicism in a most blatant and unimaginative way: by just constantly adding asides within the narration. The book's a bummer cats. A real bummer.

2018-12-26 06:41

Evolution of Love TrendKitaplar Kütüphanesi

Tarafından yazılmış kitap Tarafından: Gece Kitaplığı

Surprisingly interesting book. I would not have read it had it not been suggested for our book club. The whole idea of reading interviews about comedy writers did not seem appealing in the least. My initial thoughts, "Why would I want to have David Sedaris tell me about how he writes when I could be experiencing his actual work?" I reluctantly cracked the pages and found myself oddly interested in the interviews of the various comedy writers. As I read, I found a few themes emerging, pulling each interview together into a cohesive mosaic of thinking. Theme 1: Good comedy is honest. It comes from a space of personal, social or cultural truth. Theme 2: Many a good comedy writer possesses an interesting mix of narcissism, self loathing, and OCD. Theme 3: Many a good comedy writer appears to live in an outsider/insider space. They occupy a place that connects them to others just enough to remind them that they don't totally belong. A space of utter frustration. It reminds me of standing at a bakery window. You can smell the pastries, see the pastries and even watch others eat the pastries. But, you are not allowed to walk in and take a bite. Theme 4: Comedy is deeply rooted in human sadness. As fellow book clubber Dean stated, "It is a way to help us process our pain." After reading the interviews I have sat back and paid attention to how much comedy acts as a space where one can acknowledge the odd contradictions of the human condition. Theme 5: Everything and anything can be funny. It is not the subject of comedy that is in bad taste, it is the target of the humor that makes it such. After reading each interview I asked myself, "Would I want to sit down and share a meal with this person?" I found that for the most part the answer was, "No." While I love the work of many of these comedic artists and see some of them as downright genius, I wouldn't want many as friends. I sensed an underlying anger and impatience in many of the interviews. This was a bit off putting. From Onion writer Todd Hanson's chronic depression to David Letterman writer Merrill Markoe's exhaustive list of what is NOT funny, each writer seemed to be coming from a place of extreme judgment (whether that be directed at oneself, others, or society). What I loved most about this book was how it brought me back, time and time again, to the realization that I find my group of friends to be down right hilarious. I have spent a lot of time sharing stories and creative ventures with my friends for no other purpose than to laugh together. And laugh we do. I kept thinking how much of my life has been driven by comedy. In an ugly turn of events, reading this book made me terribly self aware of my own narcissistic tendencies. I kept wondering, "Am I funny? Would these comedians laugh with me? Do my friends find me funny?" In the end, I believe most of us share something in common with these writers. Who doesn't like to be in on a good laugh?

Okuyucu Gabriel Hernandez itibaren East York, PA, USA

Kullanıcı, bu kitapları portalın yayın kurulu olan 2017-2018'de en ilginç olarak değerlendirdi "TrendKitaplar Kütüphanesi" Tüm okuyucuların bu literatürü tanımalarını tavsiye eder.