Stephen Hawking ve Herşeyin Teorisi - Stephen Hawking And The Theory Of Everything kitap serbest oDF biçim

Modos Exhibición modosexhibicion — Great book about health in general and how to lose weight fast. I picked up a lot of stuffs here including some stuffs about being vegetarian which I really liked. Definitely one of my references when it comes to health and fat loss.

Meidei Meidei meidei_es — ** spoiler alert ** Good, engaging, and fast read. However, I was constantly distracted by (what I feel to be) the highly unlikely fact that Katniss is nearly completely oblivious of the fact that Peeta's "feigned" love is not feigned at all. Sure, when you're growing up in such a demanding situation and your role is that of primary breadwinner, your priorities are a bit different. But Katniss is smart, wary, and quite perceptive (particularly of the motivations of others)--I find it implausible that she would not stop to consider for more than a moment that Peeta's feelings are real, particularly given the rampant hints that are dropped throughout the preparation and time in the arena. I see this as largely contrary to her character, even given that she is a pretty rash and single-minded person. Nonetheless, I really enjoyed this book and read it in less than 24 hours--but if I could give this 3.5 stars I would.

Michelle De graphicsmd — A strange novel who's "failing," if it can be called that, may just be a lack of real ambition. The novel is written from a "once-removed" or reconstructive perspective. This is nothing new and nothing inherently to complain about, many great novels have been written like this (example: Doctor Faustus by Thomas Mann, but that novel is written so because the "protagonist" is compromised and in this case taken by the devil, so a third party really brings us closer to the action). But here I'm not quite sure. And again, I'm not sure if this is a "failing," but it certainly leads one to feel a bit disappointed. As many people have pointed out, it'd be better to read Ka's poetry than read this novel, but of course what he have is this novel. I don't think it'd be fair to say that this is simply a failing of the author: "he wasn't good enough to write the poems so he wrote this novel from a distance." That seems too easy, and after all, is Pamuk really felt like he should have written the poems he would have, maybe they would have been good, maybe not. But instead we have an outsider looking into a sea of passion (but not quite blind passion). The town is full of radical Islamists, radical republicans, radical Marxists, and radical lovers. But they all seem to understand the need for each other and the fact that everything is political. The Islamic Students realize that they need atheists to run the state, the political showman need the Islamists to be "moved" by their work, Ka realizes that Ipek needs him to get over Blue, etc. In this world Islam is political and atheism is a religious statement. The problem and issue seems to be that we are all more interested in radicals (be they terrorists, lovers or actors or poets). While nominally this is a novel about extremes, on closer look it reveals itself not to be at all. It is a novel about the social and political interaction of extremes. This is inherently disappointing, we'd all much rather prefer to delve into the radicals and read Ka's all consuming poetry.

Tucker Jones tuckerjones — Interesting story set against the backdrop of Apartheid about a uniaue friendship between two women (one black, one white). Not the best ever, but worth a read.

Hassan Mirza _mirza — Let me start by saying that Vera Nazarian is very, very good at worldbuilding. It's something I've seen in her other work, too. One of the great things about her writing is that it shows us these worlds. In this case, it's a world without color, a world transformed to shades of gray and silver. As a writer, I was curious to see how Nazarian would describe this place with such a limited palate, but she did an excellent job. I was half-expecting this to be the literary version of black-and-white TV, where everything's about the same, just filtered. Instead, this was a rich, lushly described world, one which seemed more real, thanks to its color-challenged palate. The story itself was strong, following a warrior woman named Ranhe Ylir as she and her companions work to overthrow a siege on the city from the forces of (literal) darkness. Ranhe was a great character. She's got the traditional stoic, loner outlook, but she's much more developed and complex than the average fantasy hero. (I could hear Nazarian's voice speaking through Ranhe when she talked about her vegetarian habits, but that's just because I've seen her write about such things before.) There were places where the story was a bit slow for my taste. I don't know whether this is a reflection of the story itself, or of my own short attention span. At times, Nazarian breaks out of the story to address the reader directly and take us on a tour of her world, and those sections didn't really work for me. Much as I admire and enjoy the worldbuilding, I prefer it to be in the context of action and the characters. Overall though, I enjoyed the book, and would certainly recommend it. It breaks away from traditional fantasy tropes and cliches, which is always nice. The characters and relationships drew me in (though it took me a few pages to remember which one was Elasirr and which was Elasand). Personally, I don't know that I'd be up for taking a concept like a colorless world and turning it into such a richly developed novel, but Nazarian pulled it off. I'll have to go back and read more closely to figure out how she did that.