Sosyal Medya İle Dijital Pazarlama itibaren Dikeyeksen Yayın Dağıtım içinde LIT biçim

Zubair Siddiqui zubairsiddiqui — While this isn't the worst book I've ever read, it certainly is far from the best. I think if this book had remained your average high school coming of age love story, it would have been a better book. I found Bella to be a likable enough character in the beginning, shy and clumsy, but she'd show some backbone if you made her angry enough. Then Edward enters the scene and takes over, he walks right over any show of strength or independence from her like he finds it funny or something. Plus throughout the book he's kind of a jerk. Then after Bella becomes obsessed with him, the entire story becomes how she can't be without him, and he has to have her, even though technically they shouldn't be together and it's 'yes,no,yes,no' for the rest of the book. I gave the book 2 stars instead of 1 because there were a handful of moments that I did like, but they were few.

Junsuke Yokoyama junsuke_yokoyama — This book is laugh out loud funny in some parts in the beginning which was welcome because I was looking for a light-hearted read. As the book went on, it got kind of boring and tedious. I liked it though. It was a cute book all in all. If you would like to borrow it, let me know. I have it out to a friend right now.

John Dexter jdbuencamino — The Science of Single. We were so hopeful when we got this one in the mail. After all, if someone could actually explain the science of dating, the common laws of attraction, compatibility and mate selection, that would be helpful to a whole swath of the populace that is still struggling to find their ideal mate. Unfortunately, this is not that. What this is, is one woman’s journey through a year of dating ‘experiments’ in different cities finding out what works and what doesn’t when it comes to meeting members of the opposite sex. In a far less than scientific quest, Machacek tries her hand at dating through the usual methods of single’s events, personal ads, online dating and in this case, travel, only to reject most of her erstwhile candidates as being a bunch of letdowns, unworthy of much continued attention. She seems to spend inordinate amounts of time worrying about how they dress, who pays for what, whether to kiss or hug, and continually focusing on trivial matters like do her prospective paramours know the ingredients in ceviche. Meh. Of course, what this drive-by dating diary fails to acknowledge is that dating and ultimately mating is not merely about chemistry and sexual compatibility (which she hardly even gets to here) but that a true journey towards compatibility involves many deeper issues, feelings, backgrounds and emotions that the author either fails to understand or prefers to endlessly gloss over in her desultory quest for Mr. Almost Perfect, please. By the end, it is apparent that most of Machacek’s problem with dating is Machacek herself. For some reason, Machacek, who admits she was not much of a dater prior to the book (it shows), is expecting one of these dates to ‘light her fire’; to exhibit all the exciting qualities that she is looking for in her mythical man. Yet, nowhere along the way does Machacek offer any compelling evidence that she herself is even worth a second date. Regretfully, she appears (in the book at least) to have little personal scintillation, no joie de vivre, no passion, no intellectually stimulative qualities or any kind of sizzle that would make her remotely enticing to any of the subjects of her quest. Her dating personality comes off as pedestrian, lifeless and boring and while her ‘marketing campaign’ may be admirable, the product comes across as simply too shoddy. Machacek fails to understand one of the first rules of life and dating; you get what you give. In short, Machacek, a freelance writer with a background in the home and hardware industry, wastes both her and her reader’s time by not knowing who she is or what she wants; having the epidemic too-high standards and wallowing in both self-pity and a debilitating superficiality reserved at best for teenagers who are merely out to have a good time. (Given her pervasive insecurities, she rarely even succeeds at that.) Dating, in Machacek’s view, often comes off as a chore; another job, something that exhausts her along the way, a bitter ennui. But is that because the candidates are all weak or does the subject suffer from a fatal combination of awkwardness, bad attitude and aim? (Are we really expected to better understand dating from someone who appears to be so bad at it herself?) By the end, Machacek finally acknowledges the folly of her ways, but not til after she wastes a year of her life and has exhausted all the chapters (and the reader) of her less-than-compelling book. A far better read in this category is Lori Gottleib’s highly-recommended, “Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough,” which while being equally autobiographical, is infused with real science from PhDs, scholars, dating coaches, statistical analysis, superior writing and a real personality behind its authorship. (In other words, a good read!) The misuse of the term ’science’ in the title of this volume, sets the reader up for a big disappointment. The book itself is breezy, but ultimately, for those trying to increase their comprehension of an admittedly complex and confusing subject, remains as inconsequential as her lackluster story itself. See for yourself here. http://scienceofsingle.com/2010/12/16...

Vishwanath Balakrishnan _ishwanath_ — ** spoiler alert ** It is an excellent book about scientific knowledge.

Ana Gamda monan5275 — I didn't find the plot as enjoyable as the first volume - the Olympia one for example, I wasn't a fan. Still the artwork is really cool so four stars from me.