Pic Programlama - Devrim Çamoğlu itibaren Dikeyeksen Yayın Dağıtım içinde LIT biçim

Beatriz Floría _eatriz_loria — A big fan of Carrott and the night watch. I'm looking forward to seeing them again. This book also has the librarian in it quite a bit, so that's a bit plus.

Hugh Mcgown hg_gh — I read this book so many times as a young person that my copy was dented, torn, and pages were wrinkled from all the times I took it into the bathtub with me (I couldn't put it down). I will never get tired of stories like this- rags to riches, sad to happy, all of that. I remember reading the parts about when she'd get a fresh roll or a warm meal and I could literally smell and taste what it must have felt like after all those months with nothing to eat. Of all the books in the world that I've read in my life, this is in the top five.

Ferry Hariyanto tjengferry779d — I read this so many times as a kid (during my Crighton phase) that my mother (who was the reading wardon) even proclaimed: "That one, again!"

Goetz Sb _oetz_ — wonderful little gems of wisdom

Jackson Yin na811 — Super cute! An easy fun read. I laughed the whole time as I read this novel.

Ebru Karaçar sillybean08455e — I have some thoughts on this book, but I'm not sure I have them in order here, so I'll just start. I like the similarities in the titles of these stories. They're all connected thematically, and the simple titles, "The Poet," "The Priest," etc. fit with that. The writing style is pleasant to read, very poetic but with some quite direct humor mixed in. I love the ending of "The Painter," where the narrator declares, "The reader will think, no doubt, that this is a very commonplace ending to a very unusual story. But he must take it or leave it. I would not utter a single false word. I would rather cut my throat." There's another line that made me laugh, but I can't recall which story it was from. It's a line regarding a dog, whose sole purpose in life was to provide a shaggy black foreground over a green background. Many (or all) of these seven stories deal with madness, insanity, and the possibility of supernatural interference of a romantic nature. I feel like with a couple of the stories, rational explanations might be acceptable, and in the others there are most certainly supernatural things going on. "The Adolescent." There's less discussion in this one about the possibility of hallucination or madness, and it's told more directly, a woman climbs out of a painting, to come to the narrator. "The Priest." Here the storyteller says quite plainly that he is unsure whether the events he describes happened in a dream or real life. But it seems more like he's saying that as a last-ditch sort of effort to deny what's happened. Because even his superior by the end believes he's been courting a demon. "The Opium Smoker." I take this one as simply a drug-induced hallucination. "The Actor." In this story, the Devil himself is involved, and there isn't much discussion about the reality of events. "The Tourist." This one could go either way. And lastly, "The Poet"--this story threw me off a little bit. It seems less like the others. I'm only halfway through Richard Holmes' introduction (I wanted to save that for after reading the stories, as sometimes the intros in these collections give away more than I want to know prior to reading), but I saw in there that this one is nonfiction? reply | editLoading-trans | deleteLoading-trans | flag * message 2: by Michael, Werewolfman Mar 08, 2011 08:39am 42934 I agree. The thematic connections between the pieces seem to be twofold. First, each, with the possible exception of "The Poet," deals with the dark power of desire. Secondly, there is a supernatural element that is questionably created by the arousal of the protagonist. I was never sure whether Gautier meant his fantoms to be anything more than the manifestation of his desire for women. Even the Devil in "The Actor" seems like just an extension of the narrators strange uncontrollable utterances. It's almost as if he's created the devil to explain his own devilish behavior. In "The Priest" I never thought of the demon woman as an actual spirit, but only as demonic in the eyes of a holy and celibate priest. Her retinue is described in a supernatural way, but I think the priest is just seeing Africans for the first time and thinking they are the demon's otherworldly helpers. While Gautier has a fun, relaxed way of telling a story, I thought many of the stories lacked a compelling resolution. This must have been a great lead up to modernism, where the plot is not necessarily integral to the success of the story, but here I was expecting more of a satisfying development of each story. He brings his characters to life in such a vivid way and then lets them drop at the end like puppets who've been abandoned in mid-line. "The Poet" is not strictly non-fiction. I think it's something like a fictionalized eulogy for his poet body Nerval. In this respect, the piece reminds me of Borges in its radical blending of reality and fiction. Its really meant to be read as truth, and reminds us that in order to enjoy any piece of literature we have to suspend our disbelief and live in the world of the story.