Zana ü Rewşenbir Evdırehim Rehmi Hekkari ücretsiz kitap indir

özgün Evren ozgunevren — ** spoiler alert ** I couldn't really get on with it, I sort of got immune to the action because it was on the go all of the time. and why is it always the animals that die?

Pallavi Prabhu pallaviprabhu84 — I love the early Anita Blake books and this is one of the best. The fast paced narrative, told in first person by Anita, really keeps the story moving. Laurell K Hamilton’s writing style initiates you into Anita’s world with ease. It is a book to savour because it’s not a lengthy book and once you start reading it you don’t want the story to end. You just can’t help yourself from liking Anita. She lives in a world of monsters, where she has to make decisions that make her wonder if she is becoming one of the monsters too. At the same time because the narrative is in first person, you not only get to hear her fears about the state of her immortal soul but her fears of getting blood on her outfits, how hard it is to get blood off dress shoes and her fears about what her neighbours will think if they see her coming home at three in the morning with her guns drawn. It makes her seem more like a real person and gives her character some depth. The good news is that if you like this book there are plenty more books in the Anita Blake series to follow it. The bad news is that they are not all as good as this one. If you enjoy the book Check out the comic books they are excellent!

Irina Liubchenko _iubchenko — ORIGINALLY POSTED AT Fantasy Literature. The Sword of Shannara was a very popular book back in the 70s right after the huge success of The Lord of the Rings when everyone wanted to read more fantasy. I wasn't old enough to read it back then, so I came to it much later. I read part of the first book and, knowing how popular it had been, and feeling like it was a classic, I was prepared to enjoy it. About half way through I gave it to my ten year old son. The weird thing is, it's so like The Lord of the Rings, at the same time that it's not. I don't mind a few common fantasy elements (especially in works written before they were cliché), but Brooks' plot and characters come almost straight out of Tolkien. This may have been acceptable if the writing had come straight out of Tolkien, too, but Brooks' style is clunky, wordy, and awkward. Adjectives and adverbs are used without restraint. I mean there are constant repetitive superfluous unnecessary redundant profligate excessive numbers of adjectives. And did I mention the weirdly-placed adverbs which are used unsparingly, unrestrainedly, extravagantly, and immoderately? And annoyingly? . . . When I couldn't care less whether Shea and Flick (they're the hobbits-- I mean the heroes) live or die, then the characterization is weak. Actually, I was kind of hoping that they would die. If they died, the book would have to end, right? Conclusion: These are fine for kids (at least this one is, I can't say if all of the later Shannara books are -- probably not). But, do you really want to teach them to write like that? If not, give them C.S. Lewis, J.K. Rowling, Susan Cooper, and Lloyd Alexander. To be fair: This series is wildly popular. Perhaps the writing gets better (it has been 30 years, after all). I have heard that only the first book is too much like Tolkien. But I'll never know for sure because I can't make it through the first one. Read more Terry Brooks reviews at Fantasy Literature

Cláudia Favinha claudiafavinha — Read it in one sitting without cheating and reading the last chapter before I got to the end of the book.

Cablepower Cablepower _able_ower — cute stories

Nettsu Nettsu gupenlingc5a5 — So far, so good. I am on page 32.