Saftirik Greg’in Günlüğü 6: Panik Yok! - Jeff Kinney ücretsiz kitap indir

Zongjyun Yu 886_un — As someone who secretely loves murder mysteries and not-so-secretely loves the middle ages and particularely medieval philosophy, I fell completely in love with this book. It was well-written, the story was good and exciting, and there were so many great little facts about the middle ages (some I already knew, some I didn't) that got me really excited. The quotes in Latin might be too much for some people, as well as the rants William goes on. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone not interested in the middle ages, but for those of you that are this is a MUST READ. It is now one of my favourite books. Oh, and don't watch the film.

Sierra Kamatchus kamatchus — You know, the writing here wasn't all that great, but I enjoyed it quite a bit. It had been too long since Star Trek had been on the screen and I enjoyed the first movie immensly even if it was a light retelling of one of the TV Episodes. Roddenberry captured something of the passion of the basic Star Trek Universe, though, in his words.

Luân Quôc luan2quoc488f — Jess, my 8-year old little girl, gave it 3 stars. Comments while reading: 1. "I want to read this book because all the kids in my class have read it." 2. "That's the CHEESE! Don't touch it! Why? Because if you touch it you'll have the 'cheese touch'." 3. "What is the 'cheese touch'? Just read the book!" 4. "He had to tie his fingers together so he won't get the cheese touch. And he got a D in handwriting." 5. "Is it true that if your hand is bigger than your face you have low intelligence?" 6. "What is a dork? Okay. Rawley is so dorky!" 7. "Rodrick is the brother. He's like, a teenager --- that's why he leaves his dirty underwear everywhere." 8. "What's a soprano? Oh, like that Carmen lady?" 9. "I want to buy the real book because I want to be able to write and draw on it. My friends all do it."

Daylight Road daylightroad — Interesting read. The book is somewhat split in half. Half of it tries to use the life of the protagonist as a way to explore the triggers of a "run" of innovations, while the final portion focus, in a much more fragmented and less thorough way on his relationship to questions of faith, politics, and the US. It felt a little hurried and stretched in the second half and too much time was spent on trying to laud Priestley's important role, rather than dig deeper into some of the encounters and issues involved.

Amol Pawar amolspawar — The novel is, in my opinion, a masterpiece from the point of view that it manages to play very well with the reader's feelings and attitude towards the main character according to who is telling the story - whereas in the first part you almost feel sympathetic and you somewhat understand the way of thinking of the character and his actions, when you get to read the journal passages the girl writes you discover how horrified she was of everything and how awful she felt throughout the whole time she was captive. From a psychological point of view, it is the first book i read that actually makes you enter the mind of the character and makes you understand him only to change your perspective to 180 degrees afterwards. After reading, you might even feel a bit shocked that you got to agree with what is, after all, a kidnapper. Still, at the same time it makes you wander what is normality after all and who defines it. Also - how can you convince someone of their insanity when their actions are perfectly justified for them?