Tebbet Suresi Ve Küfür ücretsiz kitap indir

Dave Close _rgn_ec01 — I liked this book. It was about patterns we are all aware of but just don't find the time or reason to articulate them.

Peter Maher _ie4s — LOVED this book. Ironically, I purchased this book for my little brother. He convinced me to read it. The book is classic fantasy. I enjoyed the "frame" around the book - the narrator is sitting in an inn telling the story to other characters. I can't wait for the 3rd book to be published!

Apoorva George _poorva31_ennifer — Reread yet again. A quiet book. It is about the space around events, not the events themselves. There are nice statues, many rivers, and an old trout.

Phoebe Sinnassamy _hoebe01 — Odd. Deeply flawed. Yet, still the bard. This is considered a comedy since multiple couples are about to hop into the sack at finis and no one dies. Well, not physically. But what stays in the mind is the ugly, mutual, overwhelming, hatred of Shylock and Antonio. Surely no ha-ha there. Shylock's (relatively few) lines are amazing, the casket/flesh gimmicks gimmicky and the love plot lines all very thin indeed. Also not sure about Jessica's willingness to dump dad and steal his loot, why Portia thinks a loser like Bassanio is such a good catch or how Antonio can be such a hero (to B) and scumbag (to S) at the same time. And I'm not sure any of it can be explained away by human complexity. I think maybe it's just not a great play, but with two fascinating (Shylock/Portia) characters. Addendum: having subsequently witnessed an excellent production of Merchant and read some interesting commentary by folks far smarter than I, I felt the need to add back the star and soften some of the above. I still think the play has flaws and that some of these can't be explained by human complexity. Rather they are more in the imperfect nature of human nature, which once again WS so brilliantly explores. The production expertly brought out the importance of the homosexual attraction of Antonio and Bassanio (perhaps a bit too obviously for some tastes, but not unwarranted) and Portia's recognition of same. (Why does Antonio insist that Bassanio forfeit his wife's wedding ring?) Alas, one "message" rings out powerfully, whether the context is 16th century (or earlier) Venice or 21st century Wall St. True love is surely hard to find; hatred and a hankering for hard cash surely taint all.