Sınav Yayınları 8. Sınıf Türkçe Paragraf Soru Bankası ücretsiz kitap indir

Thomas Vianna tomviana — جميلة مي مرهفة وشفافة إلى حد أن تشعر بكل انفعالاتها بين حروفها. أحببت جرأتها وعاطفتها..أحببت انصاتها للكون وللحياة..أحببت لغتها الناضجة.. في سوانح فتاة بدت نبرتها حاد،حتى أنك تستطيع سماع صوتها. وحين تتكلم الأنثى عن نفسها بحدة فلا يسعك إلا أن تصمت وترعي سمعك لها. اقرأوا مي.. اقرأوها كثيراً.. :)

Jonas Pariente jonaspariente — I really liked the premise of this book; the son of a God finds out about his father's godliness only after his death. Too bad so much of it felt contrived. Neil Gaiman is talented, don't get me wrong, but so often in this book I felt like I was being led around like a dog, or a kid in a fun house. Throughout the book there seems to be only one way that things can progress, and that way is open to us for the entire journey. Along the way there are some lovely surprises: character interactions are usually well done, Gaiman can turn a phrase wonderfully, and there are some genuinely funny moments. However, there are also lots of digressions that get tiresome. Some of the jokes come off as being tacked on and superfluous. In the middle of the book I found myself skimming paragraphs because I was tired of the belabored descriptions that weren't necessary because I had already gotten what was about to happen. Then there are scenes like the one in St. Andrews when Charlie gets up to sing. It just flowed so nicely that you couldn't help but cheer for him; I had a grin on my face the whole time. There are some interesting ideas about myth involved in the story. At one point I found myself wanting Gaiman to delve more deeply into the dynamic between Tiger and Anansi, especially as they relate to real people. Gaiman tries to keep it the story light and fun though, so he pulls back. This became frustrating and I got tired of the balancing act he seemed to be playing, trying to make it a fun read, but also trying to explore the nature of myth. I wasn't too fond of the character setup. The dynamic between Fat Charlie and Spider seemed too obvious. From the very beginning I could see where it was going; the path was none too inspiring. It is a testament to Gaiman's writing that it was still enjoyable. The ending just felt hokey, went on too long and was tied up in a nice little bow. Then Gaiman curled some more ribbon and then some more and tied some more bows. How pretty. Somebody famous once said something like, "the problem with fiction in which anything can happen is that it rarely does." The lessons don't even feel hard-won. They don't feel real. I enjoyed most of the ride but when I got to the end there was a plaque that said, "believe in yourself, have some confidence, it's all about attitude." I guess it was supposed to be fun, a farce. I'm told I take things too seriously; that is probably true. Perhaps that is a character flaw. I guess I get tired of fun; things can be "too fun". I wanted more depth, or maybe less depth. I'm not sure, but I know that the mixture didn't work for me.