Osmanlı’da Batıl İtikatlar Ve Büyü ücretsiz kitap indir

Fateen Itmam pfateend204 — Well, I decided to read Russo's first novel. You can TELL it is a first novel! I know he is a great writer though (Empire Falls, Straight Man)

Mark Stevens creativemarkstevens — I couldn't decide whether this book fell under the "loved it" or "it was amazing" category. I finally settled on "loved it" but only because I want to try (try) to keep my "it was amazing" books to an exclusive few. However, I must say that I was amazed by the book. Barnes writing was smooth and effortless to read. At the same time it was penetrating, and he could articulate feelings and contradictions with clarity. The story was wonderful. It is about Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, and George Edalji, a wrongly convicted solicitor. The book gives a great narrative about Doyle's youth and adulthood. I found the psuedo-biography fun and enlightening. Though the book is fiction, I'm sure that some of how Barnes characterized Doyle was accurate. I think one reason I enjoyed this book was because of Barnes' depiction of Edalji's legal mind and of Doyle's Victorian mind. I loved how George would analyze things thoroughly and then cross examine himself. It didn't get in the way of the story for me to have the characters constantly feeling strongly one way only to then convince themselves that they were wrong. On the contrary, that is one of the reasons I loved this book. Personally, I think this book, a finalist for the Man Booker Prize in 2005, was better than Banville's The Sea and Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go. Banville won the Booker, and it is rumored Ishiguro's came in a close second. But Arthur and George was much better than either of them.

Carlitto Santos carlittosantos — Utterly fantastic book. About a man who learns how to be self-reliant and separate himself from destructive influences. As usual, Hemingway's descriptions are brief but vivid.

Tayan Cruz tayancruz — Like many people who've commented on this, it was good but disappointing. It is so similar to My Sister's Keeper that if you've read one you don't have to read the other. The end was unnecessary, predictable, and cruel. Her twists are becoming more and more predictable, and I hope the other books I read by her are better.