Nlp Ile Satış Ve Pazarlama ücretsiz kitap indir

Eric Halverson ehalverson92 — Robin Becker has bestowed on me a new respect for semi-formalism and, ironically, for lesbian writing, which in my experience is mediocre at best. But Becker writes with professionalism and wisdom, and also with a self-awareness bordering on self-deprecation, saved, though by her mastery of semi-formalism, her willingness to flirt with imagistic and linear sentimentality. I agree with what, I think, Richard Hugo said: if you are not risking sentimentality, you are not close to you inner self. This closeness to self, to all human selves, is the attractiveness of Becker's poetry--her unblinking honesty, her fearless intimacy, which includes her explicit lesbian references. I want, though, to differentiate her from the genre of "lesbian literature." Said genre has acquired to the connotations of pure eroticism or extreme affirmation to the detriment of literary quality. Becker is first a poet and connects that thread of attention to me in a way few "lesbian authors" can.

Ostap North _stap_orth — A look at the harsh winter spent at Valley Forge by the Revolutionary Army under Washington's command.

Abel Muñoz abel_hibera9e6 — The subtitle describes it pretty well..("the amazing true story of a young family, a broken down zoo and the wild animals that changed their lives forever") except that it doesn't mention that the young mother is diagnosed with a brain tumor right in the midst of the purchase of the zoo. Written by the husband--and first time zoo director--this is an amazing story of triumph on all sorts of levels. An added enjoyment were the animal "factoids" that surprised me. Who knew that tigers have sensors to detect a victim's pulse in their two front canine teeth so that their lethal bite on the back of the neck will be successful?! It was also fascinating to learn about the "behind the scenes" activities and legal requirements connected to running a zoo!

Preecha Jadpan-in preecha_jadpanin — This book was not very interesting to me. It dragged on and on. I did not like it.

山本 拓海 yakumi — I’ve read 'politics as a vocation' and 'science as a vocation' so far. I picked this up on a recommendation as a philosopher who does it better than RW Emerson. (Read this and you can’t help but acknowledge that German Idealism is vastly superior to American transcendalism was the recommendation). The similarities and differences with Emerson are mildly striking. First, they are both lectures, most of emerson's writing evolved as speeches, and while I don't know if that’s true for Weber, these two essays make it seem plausible. While the tone is very different, the emphasis on positive action and personal responsibility seems to be at the forefront for both philosophers. I found both of the essays to be very good, though I did breeze over the middle section of both of them where he compares differing aspects of politics and science in different countries. Someone studying the rise of nazism or the failure of america intellectualism might be very interested in it, but I'm not really. However there are some truly astounding sections, and his early dissection of political motivation seems very astute. The 2nd and 3rd pages of Politics are full of great lines, Like “the mores sanctified through the unimaginable ancient recognition and habitual orientation to conform” and “obedience is determined by highly robust motives of fear and hope”. 79 In general I found his asides to be highlights. I like that his life philosophy (for lack of a better term) is only viewable in their tangential relationship to the points in the essay; he never engages with them directly. For instance on page 117, he is talking about vain power politicians and says of them, “[they] are a product of shoddy and superficially blasé attitude towards the meaning of human conduct; and it has no relation whatsoever to the knowledge of tragedy with which all action, but especially political action, is truly interwoven.” This line is buried in the excellent concluding 15 pages of Politics, which stretches back to the discussion of “sterile excitation… . “ is a ‘romanticism of the intellectually interesting’ running into emptiness devoid of all feeling of objective responsibility.” on page 115, which is a pithy summary of some of problems with academic thought . That’s amazing, as his discussion of Tolstoy and the meaning of death on page 140. With regards to contrasts with Emerson, this passage is the most interesting. What I have found so compelling about Emerson is his exploration of our ties to the natural world, our fundamental alienation forcing us to seek redemption within ourselves. Almost a Buddhist philosophy. Weber gets into something similar here, and I haven’t had the time to parse this section (138-44) adequately.

Dulini Mendis _ulini_ — I'll admit it: I skipped over a lot of the parts about the history of the trail. But the rest of it was absolutely perfect -- no one but Bryson could have written anything this hilarious about what is essentially self-inflicted torture.