Moğol İmparatorluğu Tarihi ücretsiz kitap indir

Silvia Sanchez silvia_desing — I went to grad school with Mark, and one of the poems is dedicated to me. It's my all-time favorite poem. Mark is prolific and beautiful writer; I'm not the biggest fan of poetry but I love love love this collection.

Nadeer Alabdulwahab nadeer — I liked this book way more then the first one in the series. It seems to make more sense and it wasn't as confusing at the first one. It felt like in the first book there was no intro to the character or anything. This second book explained things more clearly and the story was easier to follow. It is almost like the first book should have been a prequel.

Cablepower Cablepower _able_ower — A little dirty. Sometimes deliciously so. Sometimes uncomfortably so. This book is about a late thirties woman and how she comes to terms with erotic fantasies tugging at her consciousness as she becomes a new stay-at-home wife (and then later, mother).

Tugay Karaç tugaykarac — Four stars may be a little high, but perhaps I'm reacting against the prevailing wisdom about this book. Michael Chabon calls it "halfhearted" and says that even lovers of McCarthy must set it aside. Anthony Lane compares the book to Elmore Leonard's crime novels, but (wittily, I'll admit) writes that "if I want Leonard, I’ll take him neat, rather than slow-filtered, drop by drop, through a layer of Faulkner, then laced with the Book of Jeremiah." James Wood calls it "an unimportant, stripped-down thriller." They're all correct, I guess, but Wood is wrong when, in praising the novel’s dialogue, he writes that it is “so good that we can confidently expect the Hollywood version to excise it.” The Coen brothers didn’t excise it, of course (but then again, maybe they aren’t Hollywood, properly speaking). And I guess that’s why I give the novel four stars: because it is rendered so clearly that the Coen brothers could make a great movie out of it. Everything that’s in the movie is in the book: the dread, the landscape, the dialogue, the weirdness. It’s a testament to the Coens’ attention to detail and skill in realizing a cinematic vision (and it must be said too that what they cut from the novel—a female hitchhiker that Llewelyn has some heart-to-hearts with before he is killed; a half-baked epilogue that tries to develop Sheriff Bell’s character further and lend the novel’s events greater signficance—is no great loss), but it’s also a testament to McCarthy’s own abilities to create these vivid images, characters, and events. So what the hell—four stars it is.

Jose Luis _81 — Read for Kenton Library Book Club, March 2011. I loved this book. I have recommended it to several people and my description (A French concierge! Who is an intellectual! But hides it from people! And a very smart twelve year old girl! Who has decided that life is silly and that she will kill herself! It also has a lot of philosophy! It's very awesome!) tends to give people that "sounds horrible, what is she thinking?" look in their eyes. So my description won't do it justice. But the book is very funny and I identified with both the characters throughout the book, and the book club was in agreement about this. Though some in my book club weren't the raving fan I was, many enjoyed the novel more than most. A quick glance at Goodread reviews shows a number one star designations, so you might not like it. But I'm not interested in intellectual pursuits, philosophy or suicidal girls and I greatly loved this book. Or at least 19/20 of it as I was not at all thrilled by the ending.

Dreamie Dragon _reamie — i read this book in a day and a half. its an easy read and the reviews were very good, excepft that some said the writing was not great. i enjoyed the writing b/c it felt like the author was talking to you. it was very real. the book is about a divorce and eventho its heart breaking, the book didnt get melodramatic. i liked the book and hope to go to one of her upcoming readings in nyc.