Filozof 2018 E Kpss Tüm Adaylar İçin Video Destekli Çözümlü 5 Deneme Sınavı ücretsiz kitap indir

Rochammart Rochammart rochammart — It doesn't seem quite right to shelve this short novel under the mystery category, though it is perhaps a distant cousin of Raymond Chandler's Marlowe novels in the sense that the mystery at the core of the story--in this case, Rhee's missing father--provides the impetus for the protagonist's journey through a dark and occulted world, and the experience of following her through this world is such an intense and fascinating one that it makes the ultimate outcome of the central mystery almost irrelevant. In that sense, Heart of Darkness is a better candidate for this novel's ancestry than anything that came out of noir. The world Woodrell creates here is a distillation of the Missouri Ozarks slow filtered through prose that oscillates unsteadily between Flanery O'Connor and the Book of Job. The effect of such prose is somewhat similar to stage lighting that casts giant shadows on the background and hides actor's faces in semi-silhouette, which can exaggerate the human form into something monstrous. And Woodrell conjures up a few pretty convincing monsters here, particularly Thump Milton, the Mr. Kurtz of this particular heart of darkness. But I think what I really got from this novel wasn't the monster story so much as a vivid depiction of a closed and ancient society that exists within but very much apart from maintream society. I had seen the movie before picking up the book, and it's the ancient part of the Ozark culture that surprised me the most in this book, the various digressions in which Rhee recounts the ancestors of her people, and their founding mythology and frontier spirituality. Winter's Bone is at heart, I think, a guided tour through a world that may very well exist within our own, that resembles mainstream society only in the most superficial of ways but which functions by codes and mores that can be quite alien to those of us on the outside.

Talia Ponce taliaolimp05db — I thought I had read this book as a kid and wanted to revisit it. Well, either I never read it, or I have forgotten it completely. I did not enjoy it that much, though I did read the entire thing, Filled wiht hyperbole, a bit self-aggrandising, and boy does he use a lot of commas when he writies--even more than I do! Actually I think that stylistically it is old-fashioned, and it has not aged well. I would recommmend only for true theatre buffs, if theater is not a real passion of yours I would leave this one alone. It does not give enough sense of place and itme to make it worthwhile otherwise.

A Al-s a_alsawafi7c87 — I have a hard time even starting to write a review of this book. A very powerful story about living outside the binary gender paradigm (or more to the point living despite it).

朱 力博 zhulibo — Yes, this was as awesome as everyone said! Wow. I loved the voice, the whole stream-of-consciousness really worked well for her, and I loved that she got away with those super long sentences since my critique partners don't let me get away with mine! Seriously though, I was ready to stock my shelves with canned goods and start growing my own food after reading this! And I laughed out loud as many times as I cringed and teared up. Great book. Okay, I did have two things that bothered me about the ending though that I had a hard time getting past. WARNING: SPOILER First of all, I don't buy that Daisy just left Piper out there alone and went back to America. After everything they went through, she's just going to leave the nine year old by herself? Yes, her father was in charge now, but she could have pleaded with him to find a way to bring Piper with her, and when that didn't work, she should have hidden in the lambing shed with Piper when the officials came to bring her back to America. She considered that her home now, not America with her father and stepmother, so why just go back as if helpless when all this time she's been defiant against the man? Second, I don't buy that her father could get her out. These weren't two countries having a religious or territorial dispute that this American girl got caught in the cross-fire with - these were insuurgents who would murder a whole group of civilians including women and babies in cold blood; they would blow the face off a young man for saying the wrong thing without a second thought. If her father had strings in the state department, etc. they wouldn't have mattered with these men. So, I don't buy that he could make some phone calls and just get her sent back. Okay, so I still oved the book, just had some problems with the end!

Jingfu Chen dr_cjfbb5f — Really good writing is so simple