Atları Bağlayın Geceyi Burada Geçireceğiz - Melisa Kesmez ücretsiz kitap indir

Chris Crease ccrease4396 — At first I was laughing a lot - I worked for a large corporation and occasionally had too much time on my hands, so reading this made me laugh with recognition, and feel a little less guilty for my low productivity moments. But now I'm about a quarter of the way in and I keep wondering if anything is going to happen. Does the "We" carry through the whole book? I feel like for the "we" to not be gimmicky, something good better be coming...

Travis Johnson _d94e — Fascinating book that speaks to the time period - the mid 1920s. According to the author she fed into Hemingway's ego to the point where I believe she lost her own identity. And interestingly, his book, The Moveable Feast, solely focused on himself. I have not read much of Hemingway and having read this novel, I am not sure if I ever will. I found this egoism difficult to accept. McLain described the characters well and her emotions throughout the meeting, courtship and marriage to Hemingway. Others were shown to be very eccentric. Reading the book was similar to reading abstract art.

Paweł Frankowski frankowski — It's amazing to see into the minds of struggling readers and truely understand what they are feeling.

Incsquare Incsquare inc_quare — Davis has a great story to tell, but unfortunately he fell into the trap of wanting to write one book to 'tell it all'. The book contains some fascinating material regarding his mission for the LDS Church, including serving with someone who would one day go on to become a murderer. Davis is a talented man who writes songs also. He would have done better to have written two books. An author writes for the love of writing; a story teller writes to share something. Davis shared his soul and his pain and the book is worth reading for that alone.

Juhi Gupta _uhi26 — A clear-eyed and insightful view into the entire Iraq . . . well, fiasco. From how we got into the war to how we might be able to get out, and not leave things worse off in the long run. Ricks argues that the military fought the war it expect, not the true war on the ground, and they were very slow to learn and adjust. However, I thought that the military has actually proven to be agile, given the extreme institutional inertia they are working with. With the afterword, the book only covers through April 2007, and the fact that he is able to identify institutional improvements to strategy and tactics in just the first four years of the war is, I think, a reassuring sign. Would things have been better if we had gone in with troops and officers trained in counter-insurgency? Certainly. Compared to Vietnam, however, I feel the military was much faster to recognize the situation it was in and make the necessary adjustments.